“Those same fears are echoed today, just about a different group of immigrants,” says Andrew Lim, the director of quantitative research at New American Economy. Lim recently published a study comparing immigrants in 1907 to those in 2017.
In 1907, immigrants from Russia accounted for 19 percent of U.S. immigration, more than any other country. Next after Russia were Italy and Austria, which accounted for 15 percent each. Of the top 10 countries that immigrants came from, only two were outside of Europe: Canada (5.7 percent) and Mexico (2.7 percent). At the time, discriminatory policies like the Chinese Exclusion Act and the Gentlemen’s Agreement barred almost all immigration from China and Japan.
One fourth of these immigrants settled in New York and New Jersey, close to the major entry point of Ellis Island. In general, 1907 immigrants were much more geographically concentrated than immigrants today. Some moved west to states like Pennsylvania, Illinois and Ohio, but they didn’t settle evenly across the U.S.
In 2017, the top three states where immigrants settled were California, Texas and Florida, but “every state received or welcomed new immigrants,” Lim says. In a vast shift from 1907 when rules prevented Chinese people from immigrating, China was one of the top sources of U.S. immigrants in 2017, along with India, the Philippines, Brazil and South Korea.
Only about half of immigrants spoke English when they entered the country in 1907 (for comparison, 84 percent of immigrants in 2017 spoke English). They were also less educated and less skilled than immigrants today. Only 1.3 percent held a professional occupation, such as lawyer, teacher, engineer or doctor. The largest portion of immigrants were manual laborers who might work in warehouses or perform outdoor tasks like woodchopping. Nearly a quarter were machine operators who might drive delivery trucks or work at a laundry service.