Around 360 B.C., the ancient Greek philosopher Plato described a powerful, advanced island civilization that existed 9,000 years before his time. In his Socratic dialogues called Timaeus and Critias, he describes this civilization, located beyond the Pillars of Hercules (modern-day Strait of Gibraltar) as a vast, wealthy empire with glorious architecture, advanced technology, and a strong military.
This great civilization, according to the dialogues, was ultimately destroyed in a cataclysmic event after societal moral decay and it sank into the ocean around 9.600 B.C. Is the story of Atlantis based on any fact? Below are six of the most prominent theories about the account.
Atlantis was a mid-Atlantic continent that suddenly sunk into the ocean.
The idea that Atlantis was an actual historical place, and not just a legend invented by Plato, didn’t surface until the late 19th century. In his 1882 book, Atlantis, the Antediluvian World, the writer Ignatius Donnelly argued the accomplishments of the ancient world (such as metallurgy, language and agriculture) must have been handed down by an earlier advanced civilization, as the ancients weren’t sophisticated enough to develop these advances on their own.
Assuming the Atlantic Ocean was only a few hundred feet deep, Donnelly described a continent flooded by shifting ocean waters that sank in the exact location Plato said it did: in the Atlantic Ocean just outside the “Pillars of Hercules,” the two rocks that mark the entrance to the Straits of Gibraltar. Long after modern oceanography and a greater understanding of plate tectonics poked holes in his shifting-waters thesis, some continue to cling to Donnelly’s theory, mostly due to its adherence to Plato’s placement of Atlantis in the mid-Atlantic.