Cholera already existed before the eruption, but the colder temperatures caused by Tambora’s eruption led to the development of a new strain in the Bay of Bengal. Fewer people had immunity to this new strain of cholera, which then spread throughout the world.
Could there have been volcanoes long ago that caused more deaths than Tambora? Perhaps, but because we have no way of knowing, historians generally agree that Tambora caused the most immediate deaths.
For example, the Krakatoa eruption in Indonesia in 1883 is more famous than Tambora because it was a “new media event” that spread around the world through telegrams and photography, Wood says. But this eruption was actually weaker than Tambora’s. And so, even though it had an enormous death toll at 36,000, it was less deadly overall. And while Mount Vesuvius’ destruction of Pompeii in 79 A.D. is one of the most famous volcanic eruptions, its death toll of 2,000 was only a fraction of Tambora’s.
Joseph Manning, a professor of classics and history at Yale University, says that in today’s world, the after-effects of volcanoes are much more dangerous than the direct impact. Because of technological advances, we’re able to more accurately predict when volcanic eruptions will occur in time for evacuations and safety measures, like when flights were canceled in anticipation of a 2017 Mount Agung eruption in Bali; or in January 2018, when the Philippines began evacuating residents near Mount Mayon before a major eruption.
“There’s probably less and less risk of people actually dying from the event,” he says. “But there’s a lot of risk with hydroclimate shocks and drought all over the world, especially in monsoon areas of the world like India, like East Asia, like East Africa.”
Manning believes we don’t worry enough about “those kinds of impacts, which are going to affect not only direct death toll,” but also our ecosystems for years to come.